<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cover to Cover #258: Feedback and More</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/04/16/cover-to-cover-258/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/04/16/cover-to-cover-258/</link>
	<description>Conversations with the Creators of Science Fiction, Fantasy and Thrillers!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 05:12:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blue Tyson</title>
		<link>http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/04/16/cover-to-cover-258/comment-page-1/#comment-28232</link>
		<dc:creator>Blue Tyson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 13:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/04/16/cover-to-cover-258/#comment-28232</guid>
		<description>If the romance readers keep reading the Urban fantasy stuff, it might not go anywhere soon.  Although even my sister, who is into that sort of romance thing says there is truckloads of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the romance readers keep reading the Urban fantasy stuff, it might not go anywhere soon.  Although even my sister, who is into that sort of romance thing says there is truckloads of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trampas Whiteman</title>
		<link>http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/04/16/cover-to-cover-258/comment-page-1/#comment-25082</link>
		<dc:creator>Trampas Whiteman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/04/16/cover-to-cover-258/#comment-25082</guid>
		<description>Yeah, gotta say that I&#039;d rather not have politics on the show.  You guys are entitled to your opinions, but I listen to escape the &quot;real world.&quot;  Otherwise, love the new vibe of the show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, gotta say that I&#8217;d rather not have politics on the show.  You guys are entitled to your opinions, but I listen to escape the &#8220;real world.&#8221;  Otherwise, love the new vibe of the show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roddy Reta</title>
		<link>http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/04/16/cover-to-cover-258/comment-page-1/#comment-25075</link>
		<dc:creator>Roddy Reta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 14:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/04/16/cover-to-cover-258/#comment-25075</guid>
		<description>Again, these political debates change nobody&#039;s mind and consume valuable space.   Stackpole&#039;s a smart guy, but if he wants to do a political show for democrats, then create a separate podcast for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again, these political debates change nobody&#8217;s mind and consume valuable space.   Stackpole&#8217;s a smart guy, but if he wants to do a political show for democrats, then create a separate podcast for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: diane</title>
		<link>http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/04/16/cover-to-cover-258/comment-page-1/#comment-24755</link>
		<dc:creator>diane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 21:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/04/16/cover-to-cover-258/#comment-24755</guid>
		<description>Summer,  Thanks for the link to the original OSC interview.  I have only been listening to Cover to Cover this year and have not download all the back episodes, so I had missed seeing it.  I listened to it right away and really enjoyed it.  You folks keep up the good work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Summer,  Thanks for the link to the original OSC interview.  I have only been listening to Cover to Cover this year and have not download all the back episodes, so I had missed seeing it.  I listened to it right away and really enjoyed it.  You folks keep up the good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: diane</title>
		<link>http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/04/16/cover-to-cover-258/comment-page-1/#comment-24752</link>
		<dc:creator>diane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 21:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/04/16/cover-to-cover-258/#comment-24752</guid>
		<description>raul,  I have no desire to get in a political debate with you. That was by no means the purpose of my comments.  You are welcome to your beliefs and your freedom to air them where ever and whenever you like, as well as your right to vote your conscience in constitutional elections.  So are the hosts of Cover to Cover.  If they want it to become a liberal podcast with a liberal audience, that&#039;s fine by me.  I just thought that maybe that wasn&#039;t their intent, and I wanted to let them know that they did have a conservative audience, which they may not have realized. 

Incidentally, if you are so annoyed about being a liberal minority in Florida, have you considered a move?  There are lots of places in the US that are predominantly liberal, even when conservatives are in the White House.

Regarding OSC&#039;s book:  I&#039;m not sure I really understand your comments, but that may be just a matter of how differently we see things.  I wasn&#039;t saying you weren&#039;t allowed your opinion of the book, I just noted that there were conservatives in the book that were in the wrong as well--such as the general who attempted to establish martial law. OSC is a moderate conservative, I never said he wasn&#039;t.  Nor am I saying that people can&#039;t write and review books from a liberal perspective.  If you didn&#039;t like the book, then that is your opinion, after all.  If you were annoyed by my criticism of your critique, then I&#039;m sorry.  I just thought we were discussing differing perspectives on a good (in my opinion) book. It&#039;s as much my right to have my opinion of your critique of the book as it is your right to have your opinion of the book. Sorry for stepping on your toes.

Oh, and by the way, I&#039;m not &quot;demanding redress for supposed mistreatment,&quot; I&#039;m just airing a complaint and suggesting a compromise. I don&#039;t have to listen to their podcast, just like you don&#039;t have to buy and read OSC&#039;s books.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>raul,  I have no desire to get in a political debate with you. That was by no means the purpose of my comments.  You are welcome to your beliefs and your freedom to air them where ever and whenever you like, as well as your right to vote your conscience in constitutional elections.  So are the hosts of Cover to Cover.  If they want it to become a liberal podcast with a liberal audience, that&#8217;s fine by me.  I just thought that maybe that wasn&#8217;t their intent, and I wanted to let them know that they did have a conservative audience, which they may not have realized. </p>
<p>Incidentally, if you are so annoyed about being a liberal minority in Florida, have you considered a move?  There are lots of places in the US that are predominantly liberal, even when conservatives are in the White House.</p>
<p>Regarding OSC&#8217;s book:  I&#8217;m not sure I really understand your comments, but that may be just a matter of how differently we see things.  I wasn&#8217;t saying you weren&#8217;t allowed your opinion of the book, I just noted that there were conservatives in the book that were in the wrong as well&#8211;such as the general who attempted to establish martial law. OSC is a moderate conservative, I never said he wasn&#8217;t.  Nor am I saying that people can&#8217;t write and review books from a liberal perspective.  If you didn&#8217;t like the book, then that is your opinion, after all.  If you were annoyed by my criticism of your critique, then I&#8217;m sorry.  I just thought we were discussing differing perspectives on a good (in my opinion) book. It&#8217;s as much my right to have my opinion of your critique of the book as it is your right to have your opinion of the book. Sorry for stepping on your toes.</p>
<p>Oh, and by the way, I&#8217;m not &#8220;demanding redress for supposed mistreatment,&#8221; I&#8217;m just airing a complaint and suggesting a compromise. I don&#8217;t have to listen to their podcast, just like you don&#8217;t have to buy and read OSC&#8217;s books.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raul</title>
		<link>http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/04/16/cover-to-cover-258/comment-page-1/#comment-24636</link>
		<dc:creator>raul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 08:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/04/16/cover-to-cover-258/#comment-24636</guid>
		<description>oh, and the book&#039;s &#039;phantom&#039; evil was still willing to let the conservative forces up-end and embarass the liberal ones(literally a cackling liberal villain) in defeat. 
So if the discussion is whether its a fair representation of points(like you want in the above statements), you have no point to criticize anyone&#039;s commentary here of any ideology ideology ..because surely then OSC should have had a review from other political sources before being allowed to print a &#039;moderate&#039; view of political conflict in modern America which was not delivered.  should be able to return my hardcover copy for a full refund, just as you are demanding redress here for supposed mistreatment.

You cant have it both ways, Diane.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh, and the book&#8217;s &#8216;phantom&#8217; evil was still willing to let the conservative forces up-end and embarass the liberal ones(literally a cackling liberal villain) in defeat.<br />
So if the discussion is whether its a fair representation of points(like you want in the above statements), you have no point to criticize anyone&#8217;s commentary here of any ideology ideology ..because surely then OSC should have had a review from other political sources before being allowed to print a &#8216;moderate&#8217; view of political conflict in modern America which was not delivered.  should be able to return my hardcover copy for a full refund, just as you are demanding redress here for supposed mistreatment.</p>
<p>You cant have it both ways, Diane.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raul</title>
		<link>http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/04/16/cover-to-cover-258/comment-page-1/#comment-24634</link>
		<dc:creator>raul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 08:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/04/16/cover-to-cover-258/#comment-24634</guid>
		<description>diane; i dont think you understood my meaning(the two bush&#039;s-6/8 years). I live in Florida. So its been twice the family trouble, for my experience. 
And in any case; Clinton was really nothing hampering to conservatives after the 94 election sweeped in a heavy republican congress that spent over 200 million dollars investigating every sneeze out of the white house for the next six years and check nearly everything done. In comparison its been more like you living under the LBJ years(both in world events and political map here at home) in realistic affects if i were on the other side of the field.

The best political outcome is this senario: Strong-willed and positive visionary president(party a), House under solid control of oppositional party(party b), nearly evenly divided  senate favoring either party. The post industrial world is best served like that.

Three quick jokes is not a political rant in any case. I think that word is just popular buzzword to say to discredit the particular action spoken about. Additionally neither mine, nor stackpole&#039;s, statements have assumed there are not moderate positions. But in generalized discussions; no one talks about the &#039;0&#039; point when discussing the points of &#039;-1&#039; and &#039;+1&#039;, if thats understandable. All discusion of broad topics start at the furtherest points(unless noted) and reach more defined areas as the participants narrow the field themselves in course of discussion. To accuse someone of ignorance because of allowances to the course of pattern of speech is even more small-minded then that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>diane; i dont think you understood my meaning(the two bush&#8217;s-6/8 years). I live in Florida. So its been twice the family trouble, for my experience.<br />
And in any case; Clinton was really nothing hampering to conservatives after the 94 election sweeped in a heavy republican congress that spent over 200 million dollars investigating every sneeze out of the white house for the next six years and check nearly everything done. In comparison its been more like you living under the LBJ years(both in world events and political map here at home) in realistic affects if i were on the other side of the field.</p>
<p>The best political outcome is this senario: Strong-willed and positive visionary president(party a), House under solid control of oppositional party(party b), nearly evenly divided  senate favoring either party. The post industrial world is best served like that.</p>
<p>Three quick jokes is not a political rant in any case. I think that word is just popular buzzword to say to discredit the particular action spoken about. Additionally neither mine, nor stackpole&#8217;s, statements have assumed there are not moderate positions. But in generalized discussions; no one talks about the &#8217;0&#8242; point when discussing the points of &#8216;-1&#8242; and &#8216;+1&#8242;, if thats understandable. All discusion of broad topics start at the furtherest points(unless noted) and reach more defined areas as the participants narrow the field themselves in course of discussion. To accuse someone of ignorance because of allowances to the course of pattern of speech is even more small-minded then that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: diane</title>
		<link>http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/04/16/cover-to-cover-258/comment-page-1/#comment-24554</link>
		<dc:creator>diane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 22:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/04/16/cover-to-cover-258/#comment-24554</guid>
		<description>raul, I&#039;m sorry that you feel put upon by the current administration.  That&#039;s the nature of American politics--the side that loses (which is, incidentally, the minority at that given moment) always feels left out.  The conservatives had 8 years of it under Clinton, so don&#039;t expect me to feel sorry for you. My issue here is not the comments--I don&#039;t really expect liberals to be complementary of conservatives--but the medium.  If Stackpole wants to alienate potential readers, that&#039;s fine by me.  But since Cover to Cover is not a &quot;political&quot; podcast, I just thought that they might want to be fair about the topic.  If one view gets inadvertantly expressed, maybe they should allow the other view to get expressed as well, or at least apologize to the listeners who were tuning in for reasons other than listening to political rants. If I wanted political commentary, I would have subscribed to any number of available political podcasts.

Incidentally, your commentary regarding Empire is not necessarily fair.  There were &quot;villian&quot; conservatives in the book as well as liberals--and the biggest villian of all was of neither side. Card was presenting a moderate view--if somewhat slanted to the conservative side. Surely you can admit that there are enough flaming idiots in both parties to deserve such critique.  What Stackpole&#039;s comments--as well as yours--fail to take into account is that there are also moderate positions to both sides and to generalize in such a way about either group is an exercise in demonstrated ignorance. If Cover to Cover seeks a liberal audience, then that&#039;s fine by me, I was just commenting from the assumption that they wished to reach a broader audience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>raul, I&#8217;m sorry that you feel put upon by the current administration.  That&#8217;s the nature of American politics&#8211;the side that loses (which is, incidentally, the minority at that given moment) always feels left out.  The conservatives had 8 years of it under Clinton, so don&#8217;t expect me to feel sorry for you. My issue here is not the comments&#8211;I don&#8217;t really expect liberals to be complementary of conservatives&#8211;but the medium.  If Stackpole wants to alienate potential readers, that&#8217;s fine by me.  But since Cover to Cover is not a &#8220;political&#8221; podcast, I just thought that they might want to be fair about the topic.  If one view gets inadvertantly expressed, maybe they should allow the other view to get expressed as well, or at least apologize to the listeners who were tuning in for reasons other than listening to political rants. If I wanted political commentary, I would have subscribed to any number of available political podcasts.</p>
<p>Incidentally, your commentary regarding Empire is not necessarily fair.  There were &#8220;villian&#8221; conservatives in the book as well as liberals&#8211;and the biggest villian of all was of neither side. Card was presenting a moderate view&#8211;if somewhat slanted to the conservative side. Surely you can admit that there are enough flaming idiots in both parties to deserve such critique.  What Stackpole&#8217;s comments&#8211;as well as yours&#8211;fail to take into account is that there are also moderate positions to both sides and to generalize in such a way about either group is an exercise in demonstrated ignorance. If Cover to Cover seeks a liberal audience, then that&#8217;s fine by me, I was just commenting from the assumption that they wished to reach a broader audience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RW</title>
		<link>http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/04/16/cover-to-cover-258/comment-page-1/#comment-24482</link>
		<dc:creator>RW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 14:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/04/16/cover-to-cover-258/#comment-24482</guid>
		<description>Since I&#039;m voicemail-shy:

On this show, Stackpole basically said that you shouldn&#039;t be planning ot break into publishing with Urban Fantasy because the market is getting too crowded. Question: I know a lot of people who write Urban Fantasy (unpublished). Should they stop because the market might close up soon? Where is the balance between writing what you love and writing what&#039;s sellable (both for new and established writers)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since I&#8217;m voicemail-shy:</p>
<p>On this show, Stackpole basically said that you shouldn&#8217;t be planning ot break into publishing with Urban Fantasy because the market is getting too crowded. Question: I know a lot of people who write Urban Fantasy (unpublished). Should they stop because the market might close up soon? Where is the balance between writing what you love and writing what&#8217;s sellable (both for new and established writers)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raul</title>
		<link>http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/04/16/cover-to-cover-258/comment-page-1/#comment-24302</link>
		<dc:creator>raul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 22:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/04/16/cover-to-cover-258/#comment-24302</guid>
		<description>diane, if there was any presentation of left as positive at all in empire...i would agree, but the  two most &#039;democratic party&#039; characters are the quite literally &#039;cackling villian&#039; rich liberal out of a talk show host&#039;s wet dream and the main character&#039;s wife who is only considered &#039;okay&#039; by the rest of the book&#039;s heroes because she worked for a republican(like saying the statement &#039;i have a friend that is black&#039;).

I know what it is to be treated with a lack of respect for my views...i have had two Bush&#039;s to treat me like that me that openly for the last 6/8 years. If off-handed comments on a internet show are so terrible, I would hate for you to have passed the post-2000 election as a person of opposite views...its just now that popular opinion is swaying that it seems to you personally that things have gotten &#039;worse&#039; somehow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>diane, if there was any presentation of left as positive at all in empire&#8230;i would agree, but the  two most &#8216;democratic party&#8217; characters are the quite literally &#8216;cackling villian&#8217; rich liberal out of a talk show host&#8217;s wet dream and the main character&#8217;s wife who is only considered &#8216;okay&#8217; by the rest of the book&#8217;s heroes because she worked for a republican(like saying the statement &#8216;i have a friend that is black&#8217;).</p>
<p>I know what it is to be treated with a lack of respect for my views&#8230;i have had two Bush&#8217;s to treat me like that me that openly for the last 6/8 years. If off-handed comments on a internet show are so terrible, I would hate for you to have passed the post-2000 election as a person of opposite views&#8230;its just now that popular opinion is swaying that it seems to you personally that things have gotten &#8216;worse&#8217; somehow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: diane</title>
		<link>http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/04/16/cover-to-cover-258/comment-page-1/#comment-24284</link>
		<dc:creator>diane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 21:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/04/16/cover-to-cover-258/#comment-24284</guid>
		<description>OSC always writes good commentary.  However, I think Empire was much more a 20 minutes into the future kind of book--taking a current situation (which has recently been demonstrated on Cover to Cover) and following it to a possible conclusion in the near future.  I don&#039;t think it is even all that far fetched when you take into account the total lack of respect that some people have for members of opposing political views. 

When some people make mass generalizations as to other people&#039;s intelligence and character just because they voted for someone hated by the other side--and this goes for both sides of the camp--people stop seeing their political opponents as real people with real concerns and real fears.  As OSC says in his afterword in Empire, the extreme views are so far from each other and so unwilling to compromise that the moderate views even get villified.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OSC always writes good commentary.  However, I think Empire was much more a 20 minutes into the future kind of book&#8211;taking a current situation (which has recently been demonstrated on Cover to Cover) and following it to a possible conclusion in the near future.  I don&#8217;t think it is even all that far fetched when you take into account the total lack of respect that some people have for members of opposing political views. </p>
<p>When some people make mass generalizations as to other people&#8217;s intelligence and character just because they voted for someone hated by the other side&#8211;and this goes for both sides of the camp&#8211;people stop seeing their political opponents as real people with real concerns and real fears.  As OSC says in his afterword in Empire, the extreme views are so far from each other and so unwilling to compromise that the moderate views even get villified.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raul</title>
		<link>http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/04/16/cover-to-cover-258/comment-page-1/#comment-24191</link>
		<dc:creator>raul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 10:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/04/16/cover-to-cover-258/#comment-24191</guid>
		<description>Postwatch or the ender&#039;s shadow series were much better commentary of politics...

Empire seems very rush or constrained to be hokey, could be the ties to the video game company that contacted him to write the book based off the game(i dont know whether the pc game will also be called &#039;empire&#039;)

OSC usually hits well out of the park, that was pretty disappointing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Postwatch or the ender&#8217;s shadow series were much better commentary of politics&#8230;</p>
<p>Empire seems very rush or constrained to be hokey, could be the ties to the video game company that contacted him to write the book based off the game(i dont know whether the pc game will also be called &#8216;empire&#8217;)</p>
<p>OSC usually hits well out of the park, that was pretty disappointing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Summer Brooks</title>
		<link>http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/04/16/cover-to-cover-258/comment-page-1/#comment-24100</link>
		<dc:creator>Summer Brooks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 19:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/04/16/cover-to-cover-258/#comment-24100</guid>
		<description>Alas, I don&#039;t think Tor ever sent us a copy of &quot;Empire&quot;... at least not that I can find that I put into The Library.

And we have talked to OSC in previous episodes, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dragonpage.com/2005/08/15/cover-to-cover-179/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Show #179&lt;/a&gt; and an earlier show that hasn&#039;t yet been cleaned up and linked in yet.

I also believe there was some discussion of OSC and &quot;Empire&quot; in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/03/04/with-class-22-interview-with-david-lubar/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;With Class #22&lt;/a&gt;, and in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/01/29/with-class-20-just-sheila-and-lorrie/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;With Class #20&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alas, I don&#8217;t think Tor ever sent us a copy of &#8220;Empire&#8221;&#8230; at least not that I can find that I put into The Library.</p>
<p>And we have talked to OSC in previous episodes, <a href="http://www.dragonpage.com/2005/08/15/cover-to-cover-179/" rel="nofollow">Show #179</a> and an earlier show that hasn&#8217;t yet been cleaned up and linked in yet.</p>
<p>I also believe there was some discussion of OSC and &#8220;Empire&#8221; in <a href="http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/03/04/with-class-22-interview-with-david-lubar/" rel="nofollow">With Class #22</a>, and in <a href="http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/01/29/with-class-20-just-sheila-and-lorrie/" rel="nofollow">With Class #20</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: diane</title>
		<link>http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/04/16/cover-to-cover-258/comment-page-1/#comment-24096</link>
		<dc:creator>diane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 18:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/04/16/cover-to-cover-258/#comment-24096</guid>
		<description>Hey, I enjoy your podcast, but I must say that on the last two episodes you haven&#039;t made an attempt to be broadminded and fair with your audience regarding US politics. I&#039;ve got an idea on how to balance things out.  To make it up to all of your Republican listeners (like me), why don&#039;t you interview Orson Scott Card regarding his recent book &quot;Empire,&quot; which was a really interesting commentary on the topic of extreme sides in politics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I enjoy your podcast, but I must say that on the last two episodes you haven&#8217;t made an attempt to be broadminded and fair with your audience regarding US politics. I&#8217;ve got an idea on how to balance things out.  To make it up to all of your Republican listeners (like me), why don&#8217;t you interview Orson Scott Card regarding his recent book &#8220;Empire,&#8221; which was a really interesting commentary on the topic of extreme sides in politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Summer Brooks</title>
		<link>http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/04/16/cover-to-cover-258/comment-page-1/#comment-24091</link>
		<dc:creator>Summer Brooks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 18:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/04/16/cover-to-cover-258/#comment-24091</guid>
		<description>My favorite convention is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.worldfantasy.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;World Fantasy Con&lt;/a&gt;.  It&#039;s not a media con like some of my other favorites, but is geared more towards writers and the business of fantasy writing.  It&#039;s also where they award the World Fantasy awards.

I try to go every year, and I have from 2003-2006.  I am also planning to attend this year, in Saratoga Springs NY, but I really wish someone would tell me why they plan these things in cold weather territory in November.

There are also the gatherings for the Hugo and Nebula Awards, which move around, so check your local listings for details.  I also believe that the various genre writing clubs have local and national conventions -- &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mysterywriters.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Mystery Writers of America&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rwanational.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Romance Writers of America&lt;/a&gt; are the bigger ones.

Last March, there was ICE Escape, but as far as I know, they didn&#039;t hold that con this year.  It was kinda small, but their pitch meetings board was completely full up.  I also used to always check the conference listings at Shaw Guides, &lt;a href=&quot;http://writing.shawguides.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://writing.shawguides.com/&lt;/a&gt;, but it&#039;s been years since I&#039;ve gone through the listings there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My favorite convention is <a href="http://www.worldfantasy.org/" rel="nofollow">World Fantasy Con</a>.  It&#8217;s not a media con like some of my other favorites, but is geared more towards writers and the business of fantasy writing.  It&#8217;s also where they award the World Fantasy awards.</p>
<p>I try to go every year, and I have from 2003-2006.  I am also planning to attend this year, in Saratoga Springs NY, but I really wish someone would tell me why they plan these things in cold weather territory in November.</p>
<p>There are also the gatherings for the Hugo and Nebula Awards, which move around, so check your local listings for details.  I also believe that the various genre writing clubs have local and national conventions &#8212; <a href="http://www.mysterywriters.org/" rel="nofollow">Mystery Writers of America</a>, <a href="http://www.rwanational.org/" rel="nofollow">Romance Writers of America</a> are the bigger ones.</p>
<p>Last March, there was ICE Escape, but as far as I know, they didn&#8217;t hold that con this year.  It was kinda small, but their pitch meetings board was completely full up.  I also used to always check the conference listings at Shaw Guides, <a href="http://writing.shawguides.com/" rel="nofollow">http://writing.shawguides.com/</a>, but it&#8217;s been years since I&#8217;ve gone through the listings there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raul</title>
		<link>http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/04/16/cover-to-cover-258/comment-page-1/#comment-24089</link>
		<dc:creator>raul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 17:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/04/16/cover-to-cover-258/#comment-24089</guid>
		<description>hey! fun show this time....you got a great crew to play off in there.

question for authorship-seeking: Can you guys talk about Conventions that are good for prospective writers to go to to get to know the industry and/or the different genre scenes?

Another question I have is working with other people&#039;s settings and various freedoms/limitations you can do and what is the business side of working with companies that do fiction based off games(rpg or otherwise).

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey! fun show this time&#8230;.you got a great crew to play off in there.</p>
<p>question for authorship-seeking: Can you guys talk about Conventions that are good for prospective writers to go to to get to know the industry and/or the different genre scenes?</p>
<p>Another question I have is working with other people&#8217;s settings and various freedoms/limitations you can do and what is the business side of working with companies that do fiction based off games(rpg or otherwise).</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Summer Brooks</title>
		<link>http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/04/16/cover-to-cover-258/comment-page-1/#comment-23664</link>
		<dc:creator>Summer Brooks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 17:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/04/16/cover-to-cover-258/#comment-23664</guid>
		<description>Just to clear up the &lt;em&gt;Superman&lt;/em&gt; box office tallies and opening dates:

Superman: $134,218,018 -- 12/15/1978
Superman II: $108,185,706 -- 06/19/1981
Superman III: $59,950,623 -- 06/17/1983
Superman IV: $15,681,020 -- 07/24/1987
Superman Returns: $200,081,192 -- 06/28/2006

and just to be complete:

Supergirl: $14,296,438 -- 11/21/1984

Thank you, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.boxofficemojo.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Box Office Mojo&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to clear up the <em>Superman</em> box office tallies and opening dates:</p>
<p>Superman: $134,218,018 &#8212; 12/15/1978<br />
Superman II: $108,185,706 &#8212; 06/19/1981<br />
Superman III: $59,950,623 &#8212; 06/17/1983<br />
Superman IV: $15,681,020 &#8212; 07/24/1987<br />
Superman Returns: $200,081,192 &#8212; 06/28/2006</p>
<p>and just to be complete:</p>
<p>Supergirl: $14,296,438 &#8212; 11/21/1984</p>
<p>Thank you, <a href="http://www.boxofficemojo.com/" rel="nofollow">Box Office Mojo</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

