<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cover to Cover #249: Neal Asher</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/02/05/cover-to-cover-249/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/02/05/cover-to-cover-249/</link>
	<description>Conversations with the Creators of Science Fiction, Fantasy and Thrillers!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 05:12:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blue Tyson</title>
		<link>http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/02/05/cover-to-cover-249/comment-page-1/#comment-11063</link>
		<dc:creator>Blue Tyson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 02:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/02/05/cover-to-cover-249/#comment-11063</guid>
		<description>If you could ask one of those expert novelist or other types who know, that would be great.

I hate those trade sized things, they annoy me.  Waste of shelf space and more annoying to read.  I suppose if you read books with two hands normally you wouldn&#039;t notice that bit as much, perhaps.

You also have to realise those are about $25 in greenbacks, here, too.  If all books only come out in this format, I&#039;d just stop buying them, or maybe only get a few electronic.

Only time I have ever bought those is remaindered or whatever they call it from bookcloseouts, or got one as a freebie, and been given a couple.

Given the list of books I would like to get to (thousands), not much chance of me reading anything a dozen times. :)  That would matter more to collectors over readers, I would think, the durability thing.  I think I would agree that more recent paperbacks are probably crappier quality in general, than the ones I have from the 70s/80s that are still fine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you could ask one of those expert novelist or other types who know, that would be great.</p>
<p>I hate those trade sized things, they annoy me.  Waste of shelf space and more annoying to read.  I suppose if you read books with two hands normally you wouldn&#8217;t notice that bit as much, perhaps.</p>
<p>You also have to realise those are about $25 in greenbacks, here, too.  If all books only come out in this format, I&#8217;d just stop buying them, or maybe only get a few electronic.</p>
<p>Only time I have ever bought those is remaindered or whatever they call it from bookcloseouts, or got one as a freebie, and been given a couple.</p>
<p>Given the list of books I would like to get to (thousands), not much chance of me reading anything a dozen times. <img src='http://www.dragonpage.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   That would matter more to collectors over readers, I would think, the durability thing.  I think I would agree that more recent paperbacks are probably crappier quality in general, than the ones I have from the 70s/80s that are still fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Summer Brooks</title>
		<link>http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/02/05/cover-to-cover-249/comment-page-1/#comment-9798</link>
		<dc:creator>Summer Brooks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 17:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/02/05/cover-to-cover-249/#comment-9798</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d have to defer to the published novelists here, but I think because printing costs have gone up (a mmpbd costs about $7.99 USD now), I&#039;d guess that people want to feel that they&#039;re getting enough story for their money.

I don&#039;t know if hardcovers have gone up as much as paperbacks over the past 10-15 years.  They probably have, but that&#039;s simply my opinion because of what I remember spending on paperbacks.  

HCs don&#039;t tend to fall apart after a dozen readings, where a lot of newer paperbacks seem more fragile after frequent use.  I&#039;ve even gone so far as to buy tpb reprints of older mmpb&#039;s I already owned.  Hell, I wish all of the omnibus reprints that DAW and others are putting out were coming out in tpb, instead of just some of them... I&#039;d be more inclined to buy them, instead of just thicker mmpb reprints of stuff I already have.  

As in, I bought tpb reprints of Melanie Rawn&#039;s &quot;Dragon Prince&quot; trilogy, and gave the mmpb&#039;s to a friend.  DAW hasn&#039;t reprinted the followup &quot;Dragon Star&quot; trilogy in tpb yet, though.  However, DAW reprinted CJ Cherryh&#039;s &quot;Faded Sun&quot; trilogy only as a mmpb collection.  Silly... I would have bought the tpb reprint without hesitation, but since I already have the individual novels of the trilogy as mmpb, I have no desire to rebuy the collection as an mmpb.

That&#039;s a question I&#039;d like to pose to someone in publishing... why do they choose a mmpb reprint over a tpb reprint?  Orb does classic reprints in tpb, making them more attractive... why doesn&#039;t DAW do the same with all their classic reprints?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d have to defer to the published novelists here, but I think because printing costs have gone up (a mmpbd costs about $7.99 USD now), I&#8217;d guess that people want to feel that they&#8217;re getting enough story for their money.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if hardcovers have gone up as much as paperbacks over the past 10-15 years.  They probably have, but that&#8217;s simply my opinion because of what I remember spending on paperbacks.  </p>
<p>HCs don&#8217;t tend to fall apart after a dozen readings, where a lot of newer paperbacks seem more fragile after frequent use.  I&#8217;ve even gone so far as to buy tpb reprints of older mmpb&#8217;s I already owned.  Hell, I wish all of the omnibus reprints that DAW and others are putting out were coming out in tpb, instead of just some of them&#8230; I&#8217;d be more inclined to buy them, instead of just thicker mmpb reprints of stuff I already have.  </p>
<p>As in, I bought tpb reprints of Melanie Rawn&#8217;s &#8220;Dragon Prince&#8221; trilogy, and gave the mmpb&#8217;s to a friend.  DAW hasn&#8217;t reprinted the followup &#8220;Dragon Star&#8221; trilogy in tpb yet, though.  However, DAW reprinted CJ Cherryh&#8217;s &#8220;Faded Sun&#8221; trilogy only as a mmpb collection.  Silly&#8230; I would have bought the tpb reprint without hesitation, but since I already have the individual novels of the trilogy as mmpb, I have no desire to rebuy the collection as an mmpb.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a question I&#8217;d like to pose to someone in publishing&#8230; why do they choose a mmpb reprint over a tpb reprint?  Orb does classic reprints in tpb, making them more attractive&#8230; why doesn&#8217;t DAW do the same with all their classic reprints?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blue Tyson</title>
		<link>http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/02/05/cover-to-cover-249/comment-page-1/#comment-9701</link>
		<dc:creator>Blue Tyson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 01:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/02/05/cover-to-cover-249/#comment-9701</guid>
		<description>I have a question.  How does the &#039;wanted&#039; length for books by publishers come about?

I have seen in the past saying &#039;prices go up because of the rising cost of paper&#039; - if that was really a big factor wouldn&#039;t shorter books be better, economically?

Are the 100K words books the books that sell the most, in general for &#039;original&#039; fiction? (not counting Conan, Star Wars, or whatever).

From a consumer&#039;s point of view, buying Judas Unchained certainly gets you more words for the dollar - do lots of readers mention this to authors - that they like longer books from a &#039;bang for your buck&#039; standpoint?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a question.  How does the &#8216;wanted&#8217; length for books by publishers come about?</p>
<p>I have seen in the past saying &#8216;prices go up because of the rising cost of paper&#8217; &#8211; if that was really a big factor wouldn&#8217;t shorter books be better, economically?</p>
<p>Are the 100K words books the books that sell the most, in general for &#8216;original&#8217; fiction? (not counting Conan, Star Wars, or whatever).</p>
<p>From a consumer&#8217;s point of view, buying Judas Unchained certainly gets you more words for the dollar &#8211; do lots of readers mention this to authors &#8211; that they like longer books from a &#8216;bang for your buck&#8217; standpoint?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Summer Brooks</title>
		<link>http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/02/05/cover-to-cover-249/comment-page-1/#comment-9339</link>
		<dc:creator>Summer Brooks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 16:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/02/05/cover-to-cover-249/#comment-9339</guid>
		<description>That was definitely an experience, and it turned out pretty well in the end.  And since there&#039;s a lot more fantasy novels that cross into romance and romantic territory, it&#039;s nice to know why some stories are readily embraced, and others, not so much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was definitely an experience, and it turned out pretty well in the end.  And since there&#8217;s a lot more fantasy novels that cross into romance and romantic territory, it&#8217;s nice to know why some stories are readily embraced, and others, not so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CelticBear</title>
		<link>http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/02/05/cover-to-cover-249/comment-page-1/#comment-9331</link>
		<dc:creator>CelticBear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 15:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/02/05/cover-to-cover-249/#comment-9331</guid>
		<description>Oh...wow! That&#039;s pretty eye-opening stuff. Having never read a romance novel before, I had no idea there were certain rules and expectations and terms considered insulting and the like.
Thanks for the reply!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh&#8230;wow! That&#8217;s pretty eye-opening stuff. Having never read a romance novel before, I had no idea there were certain rules and expectations and terms considered insulting and the like.<br />
Thanks for the reply!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/02/05/cover-to-cover-249/comment-page-1/#comment-9206</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 01:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/02/05/cover-to-cover-249/#comment-9206</guid>
		<description>Liam - I&#039;m having some sort of issue in posting replies so hopefully this one will go up.

Here&#039;s the link to the start of the brouhaha. 

http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/01/09/romance-and-scifi-happily-ever-after/#comments

Summer would have to tell you a bit more about the faux-pas and where the romance SMACKDOWN came about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liam &#8211; I&#8217;m having some sort of issue in posting replies so hopefully this one will go up.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the link to the start of the brouhaha. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/01/09/romance-and-scifi-happily-ever-after/#comments" rel="nofollow">http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/01/09/romance-and-scifi-happily-ever-after/#comments</a></p>
<p>Summer would have to tell you a bit more about the faux-pas and where the romance SMACKDOWN came about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/02/05/cover-to-cover-249/comment-page-1/#comment-9175</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 20:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/02/05/cover-to-cover-249/#comment-9175</guid>
		<description>I like the coverage of SciFi/Fantasy, keep it there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the coverage of SciFi/Fantasy, keep it there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CelticBear</title>
		<link>http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/02/05/cover-to-cover-249/comment-page-1/#comment-9041</link>
		<dc:creator>CelticBear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 00:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/02/05/cover-to-cover-249/#comment-9041</guid>
		<description>I must have missed something... could someone in the know explain what the deal is regarding the issue with the term &quot;romance&quot; and Nora Roberts and whatnot?
Thanks! =)
-Liam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must have missed something&#8230; could someone in the know explain what the deal is regarding the issue with the term &#8220;romance&#8221; and Nora Roberts and whatnot?<br />
Thanks! =)<br />
-Liam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lou Sytsma(Sit sma)</title>
		<link>http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/02/05/cover-to-cover-249/comment-page-1/#comment-8994</link>
		<dc:creator>Lou Sytsma(Sit sma)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 17:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/02/05/cover-to-cover-249/#comment-8994</guid>
		<description>Mr. Asher certainly seems motivated!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Asher certainly seems motivated!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yatterings &#187; Neal Asher interview</title>
		<link>http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/02/05/cover-to-cover-249/comment-page-1/#comment-8988</link>
		<dc:creator>Yatterings &#187; Neal Asher interview</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 16:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/02/05/cover-to-cover-249/#comment-8988</guid>
		<description>[...] got an email off Neal Asher regarding his interview with Dragon Page. It covers Brass Man (since the US is out of synch with the UK).Â I&#8217;ve not [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] got an email off Neal Asher regarding his interview with Dragon Page. It covers Brass Man (since the US is out of synch with the UK).Â I&#8217;ve not [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Forbidden Planet International Blog Log &#187; Neal Asher on Dragon Page podcast</title>
		<link>http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/02/05/cover-to-cover-249/comment-page-1/#comment-8977</link>
		<dc:creator>The Forbidden Planet International Blog Log &#187; Neal Asher on Dragon Page podcast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 14:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dragonpage.com/2007/02/05/cover-to-cover-249/#comment-8977</guid>
		<description>[...] Brit SF scribe Neal Asher dropped me a line to say he is interviewed over on the Dragon Page&#8217;s Cover to Cover podcast, discussing his novel Brass Man which only recently came out in the US (it&#8217;s been out here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Brit SF scribe Neal Asher dropped me a line to say he is interviewed over on the Dragon Page&#8217;s Cover to Cover podcast, discussing his novel Brass Man which only recently came out in the US (it&#8217;s been out here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

